Amid a turbulent market and a rapidly shifting energy landscape, BP (formerly known as British Petroleum) has embarked on a bold strategic pivot that has sent ripples through both the financial and environmental communities.
Image for referential purposes only
The incident, which caught the eyeballs of climate activists
The London-based energy giant, once celebrated for its progressive green ambitions, has decided to reallocate its focus back to its historically profitable oil and gas production. This dramatic turnaround, revealed in the company’s “Reset BP” announcement, comes on the heels of a year marked by staggering share price declines and the desperate hope of reviving investor confidence through increased earnings and boosted shareholder returns.
In a move that has sparked fierce debate, BP declared it would slash its net zero transition spending by USD 5 billion annually, trimming investments to a modest range of USD 2 billion per year. At the same time, the firm plans to ramp up its commitment to oil and gas by 20 per cent, pumping an additional USD 10 billion into this core area.
This recalibration signals a stark departure from the ambitious plans laid out five years ago under former CEO Bernard Looney when BP pledged to downsize its fossil fuel operations in favour of a greener, net zero future.
BP CEO Murray Auchincloss explained that the new strategy is driven by a commitment to investing in the “highest-returning businesses to drive growth.” In his eyes, the earlier, more aggressive bets on renewable energy had “gone too far, too fast,” leaving the company overexposed to volatile market conditions. Despite the renewed emphasis on hydrocarbons— projected to push oil and gas production to between 2.3 and 2.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day by 2030, following a robust output of 2.36 million in 2024 — Auchincloss reassured investors that BP remains cautiously optimistic about the potential of renewables, albeit with a much more selective approach.
This strategic retreat is not happening in isolation. It reflects a broader industry sentiment that the energy transition is unfolding more slowly than many had envisioned. Global disruptions, from the war in Ukraine and the lingering impacts of the pandemic to the unpredictable swings of energy markets, have all contributed to a scenario in which the demand for oil and gas remains as resilient as ever.
Responses